Abstract:
Despite high research interest, the systematics and taxonomy of mammalian genus Canis are among the most convoluted and controversial: species boundaries are blurred and incongruent with any existing species concept, while genetic differences between species are low. I provide an overview of existing controversies, the most recent findings, and taxonomic possibilities, and recommend the most practical and well-substantiated solutions. The genus boundaries have to be changed, with two African jackals (C. adustus & C. mesomelas) moved to a separate genus Lupulella. The systematic status of taxa occurring in eastern North America has caused much argument; most recent data indicate that Algonquin (C. lycaon lycaon) and Red (C. l rufus and recently exterminated subspecies) Wolves originate from ancient hybridization and should be considered a separate species, while two other populations are of more recent hybrid origin. The systematic position, intraspecific classification, origin and taxonomy of Dog (C. familiaris) are particularly controversial. It has been alternatively classified as a subspecies of Gray Wolf (C.lupus), a subspecies of Dingo (C. dingo), or a full species (C. familiaris) with Dingo as a subspecies. Analysis of available data shows that Dog should be classified as a full species with four subspecies, since its origin from a common ancestor with modern Gray Wolf has likely predated its domestication (contrary to the most popular view), and interbreeding between Dog and Gray Wolf in the wild is limited. It is possible that never-domesticated Dog populations have survived in southeastern Asia until very recently, or even exist today.
About The Author:
V. Dinets. Department of Psychology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA, Russian Federation
References:
1. Aggarwal R.K., Kivisild T., Ramadevi J., Singh L. Mitochondrial DNA coding region sequences support the phylogenetic distinction of two Indian wolf species. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 2007;45(2):163-172.
2. Aghbolaghi M.A., Rezaei H.R., Scandurac M., Kabolia M. Low gene flow between Iranian Grey Wolves (Canis lupus) and dogs documented using uniparental genetic markers. Zool. Middle East. 2014; 60(2):95-106.
3. Ardalan A., Kluetsch C.F., Zhang A.B., Erdogan M., Uhlén M., Houshmand M., Savolainen P. Comprehensive study of mtDNA among Southwest Asian dogs contradicts independent domestication of wolf, but implies dog-wolf hybridization. Ecol. Evol. 2011;1(3):373-385.
4. Barnett B.D. Eradication and control of feral and free-ranging dogs in the Galapagos Islands. Proc. Twelfth Vertebrate Pest Conf. 1986;8. Lincoln: University of Nebraska. 358-368.
5. Boyko A.R., Boyko R.H., Boyko C.M., Parker H.G., Castelhano M., Corey L., Bustamante C.D. Complex population structure in African village dogs and its implications for inferring dog domestication history. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106(33):13903-13908.
6. Chambers S.M., Fain S.R., Fazio B., Amaral M. An account of the taxonomy of North American wolves from morphological and genetic analyses. North American Fauna. 2012;2012:1-67.
7. Corbett L.K. The dingo in Australia and Asia. Ithaca: Comstock/Cornell Univ. Press, 1995.
8. Crowther M.S., Fillios M., Colman N., Letnic M. An updated description of the Australian dingo (Canis dingo Meyer, 1793). J. Zool. 2014;293(3):192-203.
9. Darwin C. On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: John Murray, 1859.
10. Dinets V. Peterson guide to finding mammals in North America. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2015.
11. Dinets V., Rotshild V. Zveri: Entsiklopediya prirody Rossii [Mammals of Russia]. Moscow: ABF, 1997.
12. Dinets V.,Rotshild V. Domashnie zhivotnye: Entsiklopediya prirody Rossii [Domestic animals.] Moscow: ABF, 1998.
13. Ding Z.L., Oskarsson M., Ardalan A., Angleby H., Dahlgren L.G., Tepeli C., Kirkness E., Savolainen P., Zhang Y.-P. Origins of domestic dog in Southern East Asia is supported by analysis of Y-chromosome DNA. Heredity. 2011;108(5):507-514.
14. Druzhkova A.S., Thalmann O., Trifonov V.A., Leonard J.A., Vorobieva N.V., Ovodov N.D., Grafodatsky A.F., Wayne R.K. Ancient DNA analysis affirms the canid from Altai as a primitive dog. PloS One. 2013;8(3):e57754.
15. Fleming P., Corbett L., Harden R., Thomson P. Managing the impacts of dingoes and other wild dogs. Melbourne: Bureau of Rural Sciences, 2001.
16. Francis C.M. A guide to the mammals of Southeast Asia. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.
17. Galibert F., Quignon P., Hitte C., André C. Toward understanding dog evolutionary and domestication history. CR Biol. 2011;334(3): 190-196.
18. Gaubert P., Bloch C., Benyacoub S., Abdelhamid A., Pagani P., Djagoun C.A.M.S., Couloux A., Dufour A. Reviving the African wolf Canis lupus lupaster in North and West Africa: a mitochondrial lineage ranging more than 6,000 km wide. PloS One. 2012;7(8):e42740.
19. Gray M.M., Sutter N.B., Ostrander E.A., Wayne R.K. The IGF1 small dog haplotype is derived from Middle Eastern grey wolves. BMC Biol. 2011;8(1):16.
20. Jentink O.F. The dog of the Tengger. Notes from the Leyden Museum. V. 18. Leiden: Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie te Leiden, 1897.
21. Klütsch C.F.C., Seppälä E.H., Fall T., Uhlén M., Hedhammar Å., Lohi H., Savolainen P. Regional occurrence, high frequency but low diversity of mitochondrial DNA haplogroup d1 suggests a recent dog-wolf hybridization in Scandinavia. Anim. Genet. 2011;42(1):100-103.
22. Koblmuller S., Nord M., Wayne R.K., Leonard J. Origin and status of the Great Lakes wolf. Mol. Ecol. 2009;18:2313-2326.
23. Kohlbruge J.H.F. Die Tenggeresen. Ein Alter Javanischer Volkstamm. Ethnologische Studie. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1901.
24. Koler-Matznick J. The origins of the dog revisited. Anthrozoös. 2002;15(2):98-118.
25. Koler-Matznick J., Brisbin I.L., Feinstein M., Bulmer S. An updated description of the New Guinea singing dog (Canis hallstromi, Troughton 1957). J. Zool. 2003;261(2):109-118.
26. Koler-Matznick J., Yates B.C., Bulmer S., Brisbin L.I.Jr.The New Guinea singing dog: Its status and scientific importance. Austr. Mammal. 2007;29(1):47-56.
27. Kopaliani N., Shakarashvili M., Gurielidze Z., Qurkhuli T., Tarkhnishvili D. Gene flow between wolf and shepherd dog populations in Georgia (Caucasus). J. Heredity. 2014;105(3):345-353.
28. Larson G., Karlsson E.K., Perri A., Webster M.T., Ho S.Y., Peters J., Stahl P.W., Piper P.J., Lingaas F., Fredholm M., Comstock K.E., Modianom J.F., Schelling C., Agoulnik A.I., Leegwater P.A., Dobney K., Vigne J.D., Vilà C., Andersson L., Lindblad-Toh K. Rethinking dog domestication by integrating genetics, archeology, and biogeography. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109(23):8878-8883.
29. Lavrenchenko L.A. Hybrid speciation in mammals: illusion or reality? Biol. Bull. Rev. 2014;4(3):198-209.
30. Lawrence B., Bossert W. Relationships of North American Canis shown by a multiple character analysis of selected populations. The wild canids: their systematics, behavioral ecology and evolution. Ed. M.V. Fox. N.Y.: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1975.
31. Lindblad-Toh K., Wade C.M., Mikkelsen T.S., Karlsson E.K., Jaffe D., Kamal M., Clamp M., Chang J.L,. Kulbokas E.J. III, Zody M.C., Mauceli E., Xie X., Breen M., Wayne R.K., Ostrander E.A., Ponting C., Galibert F., Smith D.s R., Jong P.J., Kirkness E., Alvarez P., Biagi T., Brockman W., Butler J., Chin C.W., Cook A., Cuff J., Daly M.J., DeCaprio D., Gnerre S., Grabherr M., Kellis M., Kleber M., Bardeleben C., Goodstadt L., Heger A., Hitte C., Kim L., Koepfli K.-P., Parker H.G., Pollinger J.P., Searle S.M.J., Sutter N.B., Thomas R., Webber C., Lander E.S. Genome sequence, comparative analysis and haplotype structure of the domestic dog. Nature. 2005;438:803-819.
32. Mech L.D., Boitani L. Wolves: behaviour, ecology and conservation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003.
33. Miklouho-Maclay N. Remarks about the circumvolutions of the cerebrum of Canis dingo. Proc. Linnean Soc. New South Wales. 1882.
34. Nowak R.M. Walker’s mammals of the world. 6th edition. V. 1. Baltimore and London: The John Hopkins Univ. Press, 1999.
35. Nowak R.M. The original status of wolves in eastern North America. Southeastern Nat. 2002;1:95-130.
36. Oskarsson M.C., Klütsch C.F., Boonyaprakob U., Wilton A., Tanabe Y., Savolainen P. Mitochondrial DNA data indicate an introduction through mainland Southeast Asia for Australian dingoes and Polynesian domestic dogs. Proc. Roy. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2012;279(1730): 967-974.
37. Ovodov N.D., Crockford S.J., Kuzmin Y.V., Higham T.F., Hodgins G.W., van der Plicht J.A. 33,000-year-old incipient dog from the Altai Mountains of Siberia: Evidence of the earliest domestication disrupted by the last glacial maximum. PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22821.
38. Pocock R.I. The fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma. V. 2.Mammalia. London: Taylor and Francis, 1941.
39. Randi E., Lucchini V., Christensen M.F., Mucci N., Funk S.M., Dolf G., Loeschcke V. Mitochondrial DNA variability in Italian and east European wolves: detecting the consequences of small population size and hybridization. Conservation Biol. 2000;14(2):464-473.
40. Reponen S.E., Brown S.K., Barnett B.D., Sacks B.N. Genetic and morphometric evidence on a Galápagos Island exposes founder effects and diversification in the first-known (truly) feral western dog population. Mol. Ecol. 2014;23(2):269-283.
41. Rutledge L.Y., Garroway C.J., Loveless K.M., Patterson B.R. Genetic differentiation of eastern wolves in Algonquin Park despite bridging gene flow between coyotes and grey wolves. Heredity. 2010;2010:1-12.
42. Savolainen P., Zhang Y., Luo J., Lundeberg J., Leitner T. Genetic evidence for an East Asian origin of domestic dogs. Science. 2002; 298:1610-1613.
43. Sillero-Zubiri C. Family Canidae (Dogs). Handbook of Mammals of the World. V. 1. Carnivores. (Eds D.E. Wilson, R.A. Mittermeier). Barcelona: Lynx Edicions, 2009:352-447.
44. Sillero-Zubiri C., Hoffmann M.J., Mech D. Canids: Foxes, Wolves, Jackals and Dogs: Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan. Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK: IUCN/SSC Canid Specialist Group, 2004.
45. Sykes W. H. Catalogue of the Mammalia of Dukhun (Deccan); with observations on their habits, etc., and characters of new species. Proc. Zool. Soc. London. 1831.
46. Thalmann O., Shapiro B., Cui P., Schuenemann V.J., Sawyer S.K., Greenfield D.L., Germonpré M.B., Sablin M.V., López-Giráldez F., Domingo-Roura X., Napierala H., Uerpmann H-P., Loponte D.M., Acosta A.A., Giemsch L., Schmitz R.W., Worthington B., Buikstra J.E., Druzhkova A., Graphodatsky A.S., Ovodov N.D., Wahlberg N., Freedman A.H., Schweizer R.M., Koepfli K.-P., Leonard J.A., Meyer M., Krause J., Pääbo S., Green R.E., Wayne R.K. Complete mitochondrial genomes of ancient canids suggest a European origin of domestic dogs. Science. 2013;342(6160):871-874.
47. Trut L.N. Early canid domestication: the farm-fox experiment. Amer.Scientist. 1999;87:160-169.
48. van Asch B., Zhang A.-B., Oskarsson M.C.R., Klütsch C.F.C., Amorim A., Savolainen P. Pre-Columbian origins of Native American dog breeds, with only limited replacement by European dogs, confirmed by mtDNA analysis. Proc. Roy. Soc. B. 2013;280(1142).
49. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.1142
50. Vila Á.C., Maldonado J.E., Wayne R.K. Phylogenetic relationships, evolution, and genetic diversity of the domestic dog. J. Hered. 1999;90:71-77.
51. Vila C., Savolainen P., Maldonado J.E., Amorim I.R., Rice J.E., Honeycutt R.L., Crandall K.A., Lundeberg J., Wayne R.K. Multiple and ancient origins of the domestic dog. Science. 1997;276:1687-1689.
52. Von Holdt B.M., Pollinger J.P., Lohmueller K.E., Han E., Parker H.G., Quignon P., Degenhardt J.D., Boyko A.R., Earl D.A., Auton A., Reynolds A., Bryc K., Brisbin A., Knowles J.C., Mosher D.S., Spady T.S., Elkahloun A., Geffen E., Pilot M., Jedrzejewski W., Greco C., Randi E., Bannasch D., Wilton A., Shearman J., Musiani M., Cargill M., Jones P.J., Qian Z., Huang J., Ding Z.-L., Zhang Y., Bustamante C.D., Ostrander E.A., Novembre J., Wayne R.K. Genome-wide SNP and haplotype analyses reveal a rich history underlying dog domestication. Nature. 2010;464(7290):898-902.
53. Walker B.L. The lost wolves of Japan. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2005.
54. Walton L.R., Joly D.O. Canis mesomelas. Mammalian Species. 2003; 715:1-9.
55. Way J.G. Taxonomic implications of morphological and genetic differences in northeastern coyotes (coywolves) (Canis latrans × C. lycaon), western coyotes (C. latrans), and eastern wolves (C. lycaon or C. lupus lycaon). The Canadian Field Naturalist. 2013;123(1):1-16.
56. Wayne R.K. Mitochondrial DNA analysis supports extensive hybridization of the endangered red wolf (Canis rufus). Nature. 1991;351: 565-568.
57. Wayne R.K. Molecular evolution of the dog family. Trends in Genetics. 1993;9(6):218-224.
58. Wayne R.K. Evolutionary genomics of dog domestication. Mamm. Genome. 2012;23(1/2):3-18.
59. Wayne R.K., Geffen E., Girman D.J., Koepfli K.P., Lau L.M., Marshall C.R. Molecular systematics of the Canidae. Syst. Biol. 1997; 46:622-653.
60. Wayne R.K., O’Brien S.J. Allozyme divergence within the Canidae. Syst. Zool. 1987;36:339-355.
61. Wayne R.K., Ostrander E.A. Origin, genetic diversity, and genome structure of the domestic dog. BioEssays (PLOS Org). 1999;21(3): 247-257.
62. Weckworth B.V., Talbot S.L., Cook J.A. Phylogeography of wolves (Canis lupus) in the Pacific Northwest. J. Mammalogy. 2010;91(2): 363-375.
63. Willems R.A. The Wolf-dog hybrid — an overview of a controversial animal. AWIC Newsletter. Baltimore: USDA, 1994/1995;5(4):9-14.
64. Wilson P.J., Grewal S., Lawford I.D., Heal J.N.M., Granacki A.G., Pennock D., Theberge J.B., Theberge M.T., Voigt D.R., Waddell W., Chambers R.E., Paquet P.C., Goulet G., Cluff D., White B.N. DNA profiles of the eastern Canadian wolf and the red wolf provide evidence for a common evolutionary history independent of the gray wolf. Can. J. Zool. 2004;78:2156-2166.
65. Woodall P.F., Pavlov P., Twyford K.L. Dingoes in Queensland: skull dimensions and the identity of wild canids. Wildlife Res. 1996;23: 581-587.
66. Young S.P., Jackson H.H.T. The Clever Coyote. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1978.
67. Zachos F.E., Lovari S. Taxonomic inflation and the poverty of the Phylogenetic Species Concept — a reply to Gippoliti and Groves. Hystrix. Italian J. Mammalogy. 2013;24(2):142-144.
