Efficient method for identification of Escherichia coli strains isolated from various chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus) organs. V. P. Terletskiy, V. I. Tyshchenko, O. B. Novikova, E. D. Dzhavadov, I. Ya. Shakhtamirov, N. L. Adaev

Abstract:

Tracing of transmission routes and identification of pathogen sources are important issues in preventive measures aimed at controlling human and animal infectious diseases. A fast and accurate method for bacterial strain identification (genotyping) allows scientifically sound planning of preventive schemes. Despite the existence of numerous bacterium genotyping techniques, there is still room for developing a unified typing approach that would be applicable to a variety of bacterial species. The aim is to develop a genotyping method allowing identification of E. coli strains circulating at Russian chicken farms. The method is based on the earlier proposed idea of double digestion and selective labeling of DNA restriction fragments (DDSL). Bacterial genomic DNA is simultaneously digested with two restriction enzymes and labeled with biotinylated deoxynucleoside triphosphates with the presence of DNA polymerase. The enzymes are chosen in silico for each bacterial species so that a limited number of DNA fragments be generated for subsequent separation in conventional agarose gel. After implementation of the study with E. coli isolates, adequate reproducibility and high discriminatory power of the technique were demonstrated. This approach was previously applied to genotyping other pathogenic bacterial species. The advantages of the proposed technique are the short turn-around time of analysis and easy availability of reagents and equipment. Transmission of a pathogen among chicken within one farm and existence of slightly different E. coli genotypes in various organs of the same individual were observed. Bacterial isolates obtained from any organ except the intestine were suitable for genotyping. Chicken intestine contains endogenous E. coli strains, which hamper the interpretation of genotyping data obtained for a set of isolates. Thus, our work demonstrates the potential of the DDSL method for genotyping field E. coli isolates in the context of molecular epizootology.

About The Authors

V. P. Terletskiy. Russian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding, Federal Agency for Scientific Organizations, St.-Petersburg, Pushkin, Russia All-Russia Research Veterinary Institute of Poultry Science, Federal Agency for Scientific Organizations, St.-Petersburg, Lomonosov, Russia, Russian Federation

V. I. Tyshchenko. Russian Research Institute of Farm Animal Genetics and Breeding, Federal Agency for Scientific Organizations, St.-Petersburg, Pushkin, Russia All-Russia Research Veterinary Institute of Poultry Science, Federal Agency for Scientific Organizations, St.-Petersburg, Lomonosov, Russia, Russian Federation

O. B. Novikova. All-Russia Research Veterinary Institute of Poultry Science, Federal Agency for Scientific Organizations, St.-Petersburg, Lomonosov, Russia, Russian Federation

E. D. Dzhavadov. All-Russia Research Veterinary Institute of Poultry Science, Federal Agency for Scientific Organizations, St.-Petersburg, Lomonosov, Russia, Russian Federation

I. Ya. Shakhtamirov. Chechen State University, Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation, Groznyi, Chechen Republic, Russia, Russian Federation

N. L. Adaev. Chechen Agricultural Research Institute, Federal Agency for Scientific Organizations, Gikalo Village, Groznyi raion, Chechen Republic, Russia, Russian Federation

References:

1. Bikandi J.,San Millan R., Rementeria A., Garaizar J. Insilico analysis

2. ofcomplete bacterial genomes:PCR AFLP PCR, andendonuclease restriction. Bioinformatics.2004;20(5):798-799.

3. Borisenkova A.N., Novikova O.B., Okonevskii P. Florfenikol in poultry breeding industry. Pticevodstvo — Poultry Science. 2012;3:43-45.

4. Dobrina M.N. Necessity for a permanent control ove salmonellosis. Zhivotnovodstvo Rossii — Russian Animal Husbandry. 2011;3:11-13.

5. Fakhr M.K., Nolan L.K., Logue C.M. Multilocus sequence typing lacks the discriminatory ability of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for typing Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005; 43(5):2215-2219.

6. Foxman B., Zhang L., Koopman J.S., Manning S.D.,Marrs C.F.Choosing an appropriate bacterial typing technique for epidemiological studies. Epidemiol. Perspect. Innov. 20052(10). DOI: 10.1186/1742-5573-2-10

7. Higgins J., Hohn C., Hornor S., Frana M., Denver M., Joeger R. Genotyping of Escherichia coli from environment and animal samples. J. Microbiol. Methods. 2007;70(2):227-235.

8. Hunter P.R., Gaston M.A. Numerical index of the discriminatory ability of typing systems: an application of Simpson’s index of diversity. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1988;26(11):2465-2466.

9. Hussein A.H., Ghanem I.A., Eid A.A., Ali M.A., Sherwood J.S., Li G., Nolan L.K., Logue C.M. Molecular and phenotypic characterization of Escherichia coli isolated from broiler chicken flocks in Egypt. Avian Dis. 2013;57(3):602-611.

10. Koort J.M.K., Lukinmaa S., Rantala M.,Unkila E., Siitonen A. Technical improvement to prevent DNA degradation of enteric pathogens in pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2002;40(9): 3497-3498.

11. Lukinmaa S., Nakari U.-M., Eklund M., Siitonen A. Application of molecular genetic methods in diagnostics and epidemiology of foodborne bacterial pathogens APMIS. 2004;112(11/12):908-929.

12. Lyhs U., Ikonen I., Pohjanvirta K.,Raninen K., Perko-Mäkelä P.,Pelkonen S.Extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli in poultry meat products on the Finnish retail marketActa Vet. Scand. 2012;54(64). DOI:10.1186/1751-0147-54-64

13. Makarov V.V. Origin and evolution of a modern epizootology. Veterinarnaya patologiya — Veterinary Pathology. 2007;3:8-17.

14. Mitani N., Koizumi A., Sano R. Masutani T., Murakawa K., Mikasa K., Okamoto Y. Molecular typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by PCR-RFLP and its usefulness in an epidemiological study of an outbreakJpn. J. Infect. Dis. 2005;58(4):250-252.

15. Tapalskii D.V., Osipov V.A., Zhavoronok S.V. Phenotyping and molecular-genetic typing of Salmonella: reality and prospects. Zhurnal mikrobiologii, epidemiologii i immunobiologii — Journal of Microbiology, Epidemiology and Immunobiology. 2005;6:88-93.

16. Terletski V., Schwarz S., Carnwath J., Niemann H. Typing of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovars Choleraesuis, Typhimurium, Dublin and laboratory strains of Escherichia coli using subtracted restriction fingerprinting (SRF). Microbiol. Res. 2003;158:135-142.

17. Terletskiy V., Kuhn G., Francioli P., Blanc D. Application and evaluation of double digest selective label (DDSL) typing technique for Pseudomonas aeruginosa hospital isolates. J. Microbiol. Methods. 2008;72(3):283-287.

18. Terletskiy V., Tyshchenko V., Martinez-Ballesteros I., Garaizar J., Bikandi J. Validation of Double Digest Selective Label database for sequenced prokaryotic genomes. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(3):417-418.

19. Van Belkum A., Tassios P.T., Dijkshoorn L., Haeggman S., Cookson B., Fry N.K., Fussing V., Green J., Feil E., Gerner-Smidt P., Brisse S., Struelens M., Escmid E.Guidelines for the validation and application of typing methods for the use in bacterial epidemiology. Clin. Microbial. Infect. 2007;13:Suppl.3:1-46.

20. Willse A., Straub T.M., Wunschel S.C., Small J.A., Call D.R., Daly D.S., Chandler D.P. Quantitative oligonucleotide microarray fingerprinting of Salmonella enterica isolates. Nucl. Acids Res. 2004;32(5): 1848-1856.

21. Zhebrun A.B., Mukomolov S.L., Narvskaya O.V. Genotyping and molecular detection of bacteria and viruses in epidemiological control over current infections. Zhurnal mikrobiologii, epidemiologii i immunobiologii — Journal of Microbiology, Epidemiology and Immunobiology. 2011;4:28-36.

This entry was posted in Tom 19-3. Bookmark the permalink.